The hearing loss of an individual could be determined by an audiometer. The problem of hearing loss could only be solved if the individual's hearing loss has been determined. Hearing devices have a hardware that is usually put together with a headphone and they fall under the control of a standard PC. We have two types of devices, software devices and hardware devices.
An example of the software AM is the Screening PC Based AM that only uses a standard computer. This can be owned and run by anyone in their homes to check their hearing. Their accuracy however is not very good because they lack a standard for calibration. Some of these screening PC based devices can be found on a hand held device that is windows driven.
The Clinical PC Based hearing loss measurement instrument is also an example and is sufficiently expensive compared to the Screening PC Based hearing failure recording device, which clearly is a software hearing device. The portray themselves as sufficiently accurate and efficient as compared to the software devices. They are useful to the professionals in hospitals, audiometric centres and also research centres. Hardware devices are less accurate than this type of devices.
There is a variety of hearing instruments offered by the market, each unique in its own way. One of them is the Astera instrument, which is a clinical one. It is PC based. Another PC based one is then Aurical hearing devices. In its clinical process, it is actually accurate and is run by batteries as well. The mid mate hearing device are not PC based but are stand alone devices. Air, bone and speech are the main features used in the audiometric process.
Itera II hearing sensors are hybrid audiometers meaning that they have both PC and stand alone system, that carry out the entire diagnostic testing process. It is also preferred because it is somewhat simple to the test session. The Xeta hearing sensors are also hybrid and are portable. Many people term them as fast, flexible and efficient. The last one is the Micro mate hearing sensor that is stand alone as well as PC based. It is easy for the test session and also to keep contact with a patient.
It is very vital to regularly check the audiometers calibration so as to be sure that the level show on the calibration is in line with that of the actual stimulus. The US for instance usually do their calibration of then audiometers acoustically. This is made successful since they have the American Standard Specification for Audiometers that sets the conditions.
If one intends to get their hearing loss, then they have to ensure that accuracy of their calibration is very high so as to get efficient results. If there are complications associated with the calibrations, it is an implication that in case of any treatment, then it will be wrong because of the wrong calibration.
It is thus clear that an audiometer is a clinical instrument but individuals could own them if they are cautious about their hearing loss. There are different audiometers as are listed above. Their calibration is an essential instrument for their performance.
An example of the software AM is the Screening PC Based AM that only uses a standard computer. This can be owned and run by anyone in their homes to check their hearing. Their accuracy however is not very good because they lack a standard for calibration. Some of these screening PC based devices can be found on a hand held device that is windows driven.
The Clinical PC Based hearing loss measurement instrument is also an example and is sufficiently expensive compared to the Screening PC Based hearing failure recording device, which clearly is a software hearing device. The portray themselves as sufficiently accurate and efficient as compared to the software devices. They are useful to the professionals in hospitals, audiometric centres and also research centres. Hardware devices are less accurate than this type of devices.
There is a variety of hearing instruments offered by the market, each unique in its own way. One of them is the Astera instrument, which is a clinical one. It is PC based. Another PC based one is then Aurical hearing devices. In its clinical process, it is actually accurate and is run by batteries as well. The mid mate hearing device are not PC based but are stand alone devices. Air, bone and speech are the main features used in the audiometric process.
Itera II hearing sensors are hybrid audiometers meaning that they have both PC and stand alone system, that carry out the entire diagnostic testing process. It is also preferred because it is somewhat simple to the test session. The Xeta hearing sensors are also hybrid and are portable. Many people term them as fast, flexible and efficient. The last one is the Micro mate hearing sensor that is stand alone as well as PC based. It is easy for the test session and also to keep contact with a patient.
It is very vital to regularly check the audiometers calibration so as to be sure that the level show on the calibration is in line with that of the actual stimulus. The US for instance usually do their calibration of then audiometers acoustically. This is made successful since they have the American Standard Specification for Audiometers that sets the conditions.
If one intends to get their hearing loss, then they have to ensure that accuracy of their calibration is very high so as to get efficient results. If there are complications associated with the calibrations, it is an implication that in case of any treatment, then it will be wrong because of the wrong calibration.
It is thus clear that an audiometer is a clinical instrument but individuals could own them if they are cautious about their hearing loss. There are different audiometers as are listed above. Their calibration is an essential instrument for their performance.
About the Author:
When you need to find a dependable audiometer, go to the web pages at www.henanmedical.com today. See the details about models and products at http://www.henanmedical.com now.
No comments:
Post a Comment